Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974525›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Machine learning algorithm for estimating and optimizing the phytochemical content and physicochemical properties of okra slices in an infrared heating system.

Hany S El-Mesery, Ahmed H ElMesiry, Evans K Quaye, Zicheng Hu, Ali Salem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hany S El-MeserySchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Ahmed H ElMesiryFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, New Mansoura University, 35742, Egypt.
Evans K QuayeSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Zicheng HuSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Ali SalemStructural Diagnostics and Analysis Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs 7622, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how different air temperatures and infrared intensities affect the physicochemical properties of dried okra at different airflow rates. The model was developed using machine learning, and Okra's physicochemical properties were optimized using a self-organizing map (SOM). The results showed that higher infrared intensity and air temperature improved rehydration and colour but reduced water activity and vitamin C levels. In contrast, faster airflow helped preserve quality by counteracting the negative effects of higher temperatures and infrared intensity. The SOM algorithm identified five optimal drying conditions, revealing that lower temperatures, lower infrared intensity, and higher airflow provided optimal conditions for improving the quality of okra slices. Interestingly, the machine learning model's predictions closely matched the test data sets, providing valuable insights for understanding and controlling the factors affecting okra drying performances. This study used machine learning to optimize the drying process of okra, a new approach for improving food drying techniques. It offers valuable insights for the food industry in its quest to improve efficiency without sacrificing product quality.

Indexed as

Infrared drying of OkraMachine Learning in Food ProcessingOptimizationphysicochemical propertiesSelf-Organizing Map

Identifiers

PMID39974525
PMCPMC11838090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.