ReviewChem & bio engineering2024
Recent Progress in 3D Printing of Polymer Materials as Soft Actuators and Robots.
Review in Chem & bio engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D/4D Printing.Chem & bio engineering · 2026Article
- Fabrication of Soft Robotics by Additive Manufacturing: From Materials to Applications.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- Influence of Network Synthesis Strategies on Liquid Crystal Elastomer Properties.Macromolecules · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in the 3D Printing of Conductive Hydrogels for Sensor Applications: A Review.Polymers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With inspiration from natural systems, various soft actuators and robots have been explored in recent years with versatile applications in biomedical and engineering fields. Soft active materials with rich stimulus-responsive characteristics have been an ideal candidate to devise these soft machines by using different manufacturing technologies. Among these technologies, three-dimensional (3D) printing shows advantages in fabricating constructs with multiple materials and sophisticated architectures. In this Review, we aim to provide an overview of recent progress on 3D printing of soft materials, robotics performances, and representative applications. Typical 3D printing techniques are briefly introduced, followed by state-of-the-art advances in 3D printing of hydrogels, shape memory polymers, liquid crystalline elastomers, and their hybrids as soft actuators and robots. From the perspective of material properties, the commonly used printing techniques and action-generation principles for typical printed constructs are discussed. Actuation performances, locomotive behaviors, and representative applications of printed soft materials are summarized. The relationship between printing structures and action performances of soft actuators and robots is also briefly discussed. Finally, the advantages and limitations of each soft material are compared, and the remaining challenges and future directions in this field are prospected.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.