ReviewChem & bio engineering2024
Exploiting the Specificity of CRISPR/Cas System for Nucleic Acids Amplification-Free Disease Diagnostics in the Point-of-Care.
Review in Chem & bio engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in CRISPR/Cas Technologies for Sensitive Cancer Detection: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Clinical Translation Roadmap.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Opportunities and Challenges in Gas Sensor Technologies for Accurate Detection of COVID-19.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Enhanced Hand-Driven Microfluidic Chip for Multiplexed Nucleic Acid Detection Based on RPA/CRISPR.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and reliable molecular diagnostics employing target nucleic acids and small biomarkers are crucial strategies required for the precise detection of numerous diseases. Although diagnoses based on nucleic acid recognition are some of the most efficient and precise procedures, these tests often require expensive equipment and skilled professionals. Recent advancements in diagnostic innovations, particularly those based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR), aim to provide thorough screening at homes, in clinics, and in the field. In comparison to traditional molecular techniques like PCR, CRISPR/Cas-based detection, using the single-stranded nucleic acid trans-cleavage abilities of Cas12 or Cas13, shows significant potential as a molecular diagnostic tool. It offers benefits such as attomolar-level sensitivity, single-base precision, and rapid turnover rates. Both Cas enzymes demonstrate exceptional specificity and sensitivity, holding substantial promise in disease diagnostics and beyond. Consequently, various amplification-free CRISPR/Cas-based detection methods have emerged, aiming to maintain sensitivity despite the absence of pre-amplification. This allows for the detection of non-nucleic acid targets and facilitates integration into point-of-care settings. This Review highlights current advances in amplification-free CRISPR/Cas detection systems in disease diagnostics and investigates their utility in point-of-care settings. Furthermore, the mechanisms of alternative CRISPR-based amplification-free detection of other small molecules, aside from nucleic acids, for disease diagnosis will also be briefly discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.