Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974461›Full record

ArticleMaedica2024

Automated Segmentation of Knee Menisci Using U-Net Deep Learning Model: Preliminary Results.

Alexei Botnari, Manuella Kadar, Daniela Rodica Puia, Jenel Marian Patrascu, Jenel Marian Patrascu

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexei BotnariDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine,"Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Manuella KadarDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Informatics and Engineering,"1 Decembrie 1918" University of Alba Iulia, 510009 Alba Iulia, Romania.
Daniela Rodica PuiaDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Informatics and Engineering,"1 Decembrie 1918" University of Alba Iulia, 510009 Alba Iulia, Romania.
Jenel Marian PatrascuDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine,"Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Jenel Marian PatrascuDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine,"Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study describes the initial findings of the detection and segmentation of the knee meniscus in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using the U-Net deep learning model. The primary goal was to develop a model that automatically identified and segmented the meniscus from the region of interest (ROI) in knee MRI scans. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe current study was conducted in two phases. Initially, a U-Net deep learning model was developed to automatically detect the meniscus using a training dataset comprising 104 knee MRI images. In the second phase, the model was fine-tuned with an additional 50 MRI scans featuring manually segmented images to segment the meniscus from the ROI accurately.

resultsAfter performing 14 training tests, the U-Net model achieved a detection accuracy of 0.91. The average Dice score for ROIs after training at 100 epochs was 0.7259. With training extended to 300 epochs, the Dice score improved to 0.7525. Finally, the model reached a Dice score of 0.7609 after 500 epochs.

conclusionsThe present study introduces a practical deep learning-based approach for segmenting the knee meniscus, which is validated against ground truth annotations from orthopedic surgeons. Despite challenges such as data scarcity and the need for sequence-specific optimization, our method demonstrates significant potential for advancing automated meniscus segmentation in clinical settings.

Identifiers

PMID39974461
PMCPMC11834842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.