ArticleMaedica2024
Automated Segmentation of Knee Menisci Using U-Net Deep Learning Model: Preliminary Results.
Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of knee injuries after skiing in adolescents under deep learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence algorithms in orthopaedics: A narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe present study describes the initial findings of the detection and segmentation of the knee meniscus in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using the U-Net deep learning model. The primary goal was to develop a model that automatically identified and segmented the meniscus from the region of interest (ROI) in knee MRI scans. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe current study was conducted in two phases. Initially, a U-Net deep learning model was developed to automatically detect the meniscus using a training dataset comprising 104 knee MRI images. In the second phase, the model was fine-tuned with an additional 50 MRI scans featuring manually segmented images to segment the meniscus from the ROI accurately.
resultsAfter performing 14 training tests, the U-Net model achieved a detection accuracy of 0.91. The average Dice score for ROIs after training at 100 epochs was 0.7259. With training extended to 300 epochs, the Dice score improved to 0.7525. Finally, the model reached a Dice score of 0.7609 after 500 epochs.
conclusionsThe present study introduces a practical deep learning-based approach for segmenting the knee meniscus, which is validated against ground truth annotations from orthopedic surgeons. Despite challenges such as data scarcity and the need for sequence-specific optimization, our method demonstrates significant potential for advancing automated meniscus segmentation in clinical settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.