ArticleMaedica2024
Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Multiple Sclerosis Who Had Exposure to Ocrelizumab: a Systematic Review of the Literature.
Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the pooled prevalence of pregnancy-related issues in women who were exposed to Ocrelizumab before or during pregnancy.
methodsPubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, references and conference abstracts were comprehensively searched by two independent researchers. The search was conducted on 1 June 2023.
resultsA literature search revealed 320 records, of which 44 full-texts were evaluated and only five studies remained for the systematic review, among which one study was conducted in Australia, one in the United States, one in Canada and one in the United Kingdom. All eligible studies were conducted between 2017 and 2022. They included a number of patients ranging from 12 to 608, and totalized 1 305 participants and 1 306 pregnancies. The pooled prevalence of term delivery was 46% (95% CI 31-61%) (I²=94.5%, P<0.001). The pooled prevalence of abortion was 9% (95% CI 4-14%) (I²=80%, P<0.001). Three studies reported on the number of ectopic pregnancies. The pooled prevalence of ectopic pregnancies was 5% (95% CI 2-4%) (I²=60%, P<0.001). The pooled prevalence of major congenital malformations was 2% (95% CI 1-3%) (I²=0).
conclusionsThe results of this systematic review show that exposure to Ocrelizumab during conception is not associated with a higher frequency of preterm deliveries or major malformations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.