Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974445›Full record

ArticleMaedica2024

Updates in Head and Neck Oncology - Current Knowledge and Future Horizons.

Camil Ciprian Mirestean, Roxana Irina Iancu, Dragos Petru Teodor Iancu

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camil Ciprian MiresteanRegional Institute of Oncology, Iasi, Romania.
Roxana Irina Iancu"Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
Dragos Petru Teodor IancuRegional Institute of Oncology, Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment for head and neck recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with immune checkpoint inhibitors has now become the new therapeutic standard, primarily replacing the EXTREME and TPex protocols that included the EGFR inhibitor Cetuximab and chemotherapy. Even if there are considerable advances in therapeutic results, less than 20% of patients with this stage of the disease survive more than four years. These results demonstrate the need to identify more effective therapies beyond simple PD1/PD-L1 blockade. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), vaccines, bispecific kinase inhibitors and fusion proteins involving the modulation of the tumor microenvironment are strategies to be exploited in the future. Also, in locally advanced cancers, the results of combining immunotherapy with chemoradiation treatment did not give the expected results. The use of other therapeutic sequences, including immunotherapy in association with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, but also the association with mTOR inhibitors are also evaluated in clinical trials. We propose to present some new directions in the therapies of locally advanced relapsed or metastatic HNSCC.

Identifiers

PMID39974445
PMCPMC11834843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.