ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2025
Ultrasound-based radiomics and clinical factors-based nomogram for early intracranial hypertension detection in patients with decompressive craniotomy.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current applications of radiomics in neurotrauma.Neurosurgical review · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnostic Use of Transcranial Doppler and Sonography: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram that combines traditional ultrasound radiomics features with clinical parameters to assess early intracranial hypertension (IH) following primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study incorporates the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method to interpret the radiomics model. Methods: This study included 199 patients with severe TBI (training cohort: Results: Among the machine learning models, the LR model demonstrated superior predictive efficiency and robustness at threshold values of 15 mmHg and 20 mmHg. At a threshold of 20 mmHg, the AUC values for the training and testing cohorts were 0.803 and 0.735 for the clinical model, 0.908 and 0.891 for the radiomics model, and 0.918 and 0.902 for the nomogram model, respectively. Similarly, at a threshold of 15 mmHg, the AUC values were consistent across models: 0.803 and 0.735 for the clinical model, 0.908 and 0.891 for the radiomics model, and 0.918 and 0.902 for the nomogram model. Notably, the nomogram model outperformed the clinical model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed a higher net benefit for predicting intracranial hypertension across all models. Conclusion: The nomogram model, which integrates both clinical-semantic and radiomics features, demonstrated strong performance in predicting intracranial hypertension across different threshold values. It shows promise for enhancing non-invasive ICP monitoring and supporting individualized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.