ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Analysis of the quality of vulvar cancer-related videos on YouTube.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the quality and reliability of cervical cancer related videos on YouTube, Bilibili, and Tiktok: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Is YouTube™ a Reliable Source of Information for the Current Use of HIPEC in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer?Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vulvar cancer is a relatively rare malignant tumor that receives less attention than other gynecological malignancies. Short-video apps are playing an important role in promoting health. This study evaluated the quality of videos about vulvar cancer on YouTube with the aim of making facts-based recommendations and promoting public health engagement. Methods: On May 15, 2024, the term "vulvar cancer" was searched on YouTube, and the top 100 videos identified in the search were chosen for our research. We evaluated the completeness of each video using six dimensions. The video quality was evaluated using the DISCERN instrument (Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information), the Results: Among the 65 videos that were included in this study, the majority (64.6%) were posted by educational and training institutes. The quality of the videos submitted by physicians was comparatively good, as indicated by the GQS scores (P=0.045). The relationships between the DISCERN categorization score and duration (P<0.001), views per day (P=0.02), likes per day (P<0.001), comments per day (P=0.03), PEMAT actionability (P<0.001), and GQS scores (P<0.001) were statistically significant. Additionally, there was a strong positive correlation between the GQS score and video length. Conclusions: The quality of videos about vulvar cancer on YouTube is unsatisfactory. However, several measures can be adopted in the future to make YouTube a more practical tool for promoting the prevention and cure of vulvar cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.