ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Testosterone and colorectal cancer: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have been conducted on the causal relationship of testosterone on colorectal cancer (CRC), the result remains controversial. We aimed to explore the genetically determined relationships between total testosterone (TT) and bioavailable testosterone (BT) with CRC using a larger sample size and more stringent methods to exclude confounding factors. Methods: Based on genome wide association studies (GWAS) data of TT, BT and CRC, we utilized bidirectional two-sample MR methods to analyze their interrelationships. Causal relationship analysis was conducted using inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode and weighted mode. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the stability of the causal relationships. Results: The bidirectional MR analysis revealed one standard deviation (SD) increase in genetically predicted BT increased the risk of CRC [IVW: odds ratio (OR) =1.834, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.121-3.001, P=0.02] and there was no causal relationship of CRC on BT. There was no causal relationship between CRC and TT. Conclusions: The findings of this study revealed a causal effect of BT on the risk of CRC, and CRC may not affect BT levels. Additionally, there was no causal relationship found between CRC and TT. Our results enhance the understanding of the real causal relationship between testosterone and CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.