ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Large language models generating synthetic clinical datasets: a feasibility and comparative analysis with real-world perioperative data.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models for generating longitudinal synthetic data in low-risk pregnancy care.Data in brief · 2026Article
- A Large Language Model-Driven System for Advance Care Planning Training Among Health Care Providers in the Chinese Context: Development and Technical Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Linguistic Fidelity and Classification Performance of Large Language Models for Generating Synthetic Operative Notes: Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Weight Management in Children: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An Evaluation of Pretrained Generative Models for Augmenting Small Health Data: Comparative Modeling Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- An Edge-Cloud Collaborative ECG-Assisted Diagnostic System Leveraging Cross-Lead Knowledge Distillation and Large Language Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of Synthetic Data Generation by Language Models in Biomedical Research and Application: Data Utility and Quality Perspectives.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2026Review
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Classification of Cleft and Craniofacial Procedures From Operative Notes: Model Development and Feasibility Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Observational
- Synthetic cervical spine radiographs: expert validation and transfer learning for low-data settings.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of common bile duct stones using synthetic data to guide emergency ERCP decisions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Grounding large language models in clinical diagnostics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Deep learning in the early diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Adaptive refinement and prompt-guided conditioning for clinically realistic LLM-generated synthetic pediatric data.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Enabling Just-in-Time Clinical Oncology Analysis With Large Language Models: Feasibility and Validation Study Using Unstructured Synthetic Data.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical data is instrumental to medical research, machine learning (ML) model development, and advancing surgical care, but access is often constrained by privacy regulations and missing data. Synthetic data offers a promising solution to preserve privacy while enabling broader data access. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) provide an opportunity to generate synthetic data with reduced reliance on domain expertise, computational resources, and pre-training. Objective: This study aims to assess the feasibility of generating realistic tabular clinical data with OpenAI's GPT-4o using zero-shot prompting, and evaluate the fidelity of LLM-generated data by comparing its statistical properties to the Vital Signs DataBase (VitalDB), a real-world open-source perioperative dataset. Methods: In Phase 1, GPT-4o was prompted to generate a dataset with qualitative descriptions of 13 clinical parameters. The resultant data was assessed for general errors, plausibility of outputs, and cross-verification of related parameters. In Phase 2, GPT-4o was prompted to generate a dataset using descriptive statistics of the VitalDB dataset. Fidelity was assessed using two-sample Results: In Phase 1, GPT-4o generated a complete and structured dataset comprising 6,166 case files. The dataset was plausible in range and correctly calculated body mass index for all case files based on respective heights and weights. Statistical comparison between the LLM-generated datasets and VitalDB revealed that Phase 2 data achieved significant fidelity. Phase 2 data demonstrated statistical similarity in 12/13 (92.31%) parameters, whereby no statistically significant differences were observed in 6/6 (100.0%) categorical/binary and 6/7 (85.71%) continuous parameters. Overlap of 95% CIs were observed in 6/7 (85.71%) continuous parameters. Conclusion: Zero-shot prompting with GPT-4o can generate realistic tabular synthetic datasets, which can replicate key statistical properties of real-world perioperative data. This study highlights the potential of LLMs as a novel and accessible modality for synthetic data generation, which may address critical barriers in clinical data access and eliminate the need for technical expertise, extensive computational resources, and pre-training. Further research is warranted to enhance fidelity and investigate the use of LLMs to amplify and augment datasets, preserve multivariate relationships, and train robust ML models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.