Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974269›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Delays and Discrepancies in the Care of Older Injured Patients Across the United Kingdom: A Cohort Study.

Timothy M Morris, Tom W Walshaw, Emily Winn, Thomas E Baldock, William G Eardley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy M MorrisTrauma and Orthopaedics, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, GBR.
Tom W WalshawTrauma and Orthopaedics, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, GBR.
Emily WinnTrauma and Orthopaedics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, GBR.
Thomas E BaldockTrauma and Orthopaedics, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, GBR.
William G EardleyTrauma and Orthopaedics, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The average age of patients undergoing orthopaedic trauma surgery increases with over half of these procedures performed on older patients (over 60 years old). Despite this, the treatment of older trauma patients varies widely from their younger counterparts. Whilst diverging demographics and differing management are previously reported, no data is available regarding injury characteristics, comparative delays, cancellations or escalation to other lists. Through an analysis of the ORTHOPOD database, we provide a unique insight to improve understanding and challenge the current status of anecdotes and dogma. Methods A total of 22,585 patients from 83 hospitals (61 trauma units (TUs) and 22 major trauma centres (MTCs)) across the United Kingdom (UK) admitted over two months (August 22, 2022, to October 16, 2022) were analyzed to determine contemporary care in older patients within the current pathways. Results Older adults dominate the trauma caseload with 66% of operations being performed on this cohort and fragility proximal femur fracture (FPFF) patients alone accounting for over 1,500 more operations than for all fractures in younger adults (6369 vs 4806). Older trauma patients wait 40% and 60% longer for surgery as inpatients and outpatients, respectively. They also experience 25% more cancellations and are more likely to be managed entirely within a TU, be treated as an inpatient and sustain lower limb fractures. Conversely, they are one-third less likely to be escalated to elective lists. Regarding FPFF patients specifically, 70% are treated in TUs but, if treated in an MTC, both the cancellation rate and inpatient surgical delay are 25% higher than in TUs. Conclusion This analysis demonstrates the inequity in treatment received by older trauma patients. Despite comprising most of the UK's trauma burden, this cohort waits significantly longer for surgery as both inpatients and outpatients and experience higher cancellation rates. This is despite these patients being frailer and more likely to be treated as inpatients since their injuries are often severe, for example, all femoral fractures are more common in older adults. Furthermore, they are less likely to be escalated to elective lists. This corroborates the need for initiatives to integrate dedicated patient pathways for older injured patients within trauma networks, for example, older injured adult trauma multi-disciplinary teams.

Indexed as

cancellation ratefragility proximal femur fracturegeriatricsurgical delaytrauma

Identifiers

PMID39974269
PMCPMC11836590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.