ArticleCureus2025
Rash and Fever: Identifying Animal or Plant Origins.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phytophotodermatitis is a dermatological condition resulting from exposure of the skin to furanocoumarins and subsequent exposure to ultraviolet radiation. It has been described mainly after direct contact with plants but also with their extracts, particularly limes, lemons, figs, celery, or parsley. The clinical presentation is variable and may range from asymptomatic to erythematous rash, which may progress into vesicles or bullae. The main differential diagnoses are contact dermatitis, allergic dermatitis, and burns. The diagnosis is based on clinical history, clinical findings, and physical examination. In such cases, accurate diagnosis is necessary to avoid unnecessary treatment. We present the case of a 55-year-old patient with recurrent episodes of pruritus who presented with a new rash and fever. After a review of the aetiology and clinical history, supported by a skin biopsy, a diagnosis of phytophotodermatitis with secondary bacterial infection was made. After treatment with antibiotics and corticosteroids, the symptoms disappeared, and a non-pharmacological approach was recommended. The aim of this article is, therefore, to emphasize the significance of this disorder, to raise awareness of it, and to emphasize the importance, in an increasingly technological age, of a detailed clinical history and physical examination as the main tool for a correct diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.