Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974249›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Mental Health and Well-Being in the Modern Era: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges and Interventions.

Aminat Magomedova, Ghizal Fatima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frozen in time: Breaking free from past family practice models.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aminat MagomedovaDepartment of Population, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, RUS.
Ghizal FatimaDepartment of Public Health, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical global concern in the modern era is mental health and well-being, where rapid socioeconomic change, technological advancements, and lifestyle shifts have significantly impacted individuals' psychological health. Primary stressors today include urbanization, digital dependency, social isolation, and economic pressures, alongside the escalating prevalence of mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, and burnout. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated global mental health crises, increasing the vulnerability of populations during times of uncertainty and instability. This paper critically examines emerging connections between mental health and lifestyle factors such as sleep, diet, and exercise. Interventions are discussed from a multidimensional perspective, encompassing pharmacological treatments, psychotherapy, digital mental health tools, and community-based programs. Special attention is given to the rise of telemedicine and mobile mental health apps, offering innovative solutions to bridge gaps in mental healthcare accessibility. Furthermore, the review underscores the importance of preventive approaches, promoting mental health literacy, reducing stigma, and fostering resilience through mindfulness, cognitive behavioral techniques, and social support systems.

Indexed as

digital healthinterventionsmental disordersmental healthmodern challengeswell-being

Identifiers

PMID39974249
PMCPMC11836072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.