ArticleCureus2025
Factors Impacting Patient Satisfaction at a Single Academic Sports Medicine Institution.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient satisfaction has become an important metric in many healthcare settings, as it relates to patient outcomes and improvement in healthcare quality. The Press Ganey tool is a common assessment used to evaluate patient satisfaction. To our knowledge, there are no studies that effectively determine what influences a patient's healthcare experience in a sports medicine setting. The purpose of this study was to determine which factors impact Press Ganey patient satisfaction at a single, academic sports medicine institution.
methodsPress Ganey surveys with questions about the provider, appointment date, sex, age, first visits vs. subsequent visits, and in-person vs. telehealth visits were utilized and emailed to patients within one week of their visit. Questions were rated on a Likert scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). Data from 2017 to 2022 were then aggregated retrospectively and de-identified. The 2022 Area Deprivation Index (ADI; higher scores indicate higher deprivation) was also used based on the patient's zip code. Statistical analysis with the use of a multivariate linear regression model was used to identify potential variables associated with patient-reported provider scores.
resultsThe study included data from 12,518 patient visits managed by eight sports medicine providers. Analysis revealed that age, appointment date (specifically the first visit), and the provider involved had statistically significant associations with Press Ganey satisfaction scores, with p-values of <0.001 for each factor. Age was positively correlated with satisfaction (coefficient = 0.160), indicating that older patients reported higher satisfaction levels compared to younger patients. Conversely, the appointment date, particularly at the initial visit, had a negative coefficient, demonstrating that patient satisfaction increased with subsequent visits. Additionally, when analyzing Press Ganey scores in relation to the ADI, it was found that patients with lower ADI scores, which indicate lower levels of social deprivation, reported higher satisfaction with their care providers.
conclusionOur study reveals that patient satisfaction seems to be affected by age, timing of visits, socioeconomic status, and provider at an academic sports medicine institution. While these factors may be somewhat unmodifiable, a better understanding of patient and provider characteristics can help maximize the patient's satisfaction with their healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.