Observational studyBiochemia medica2025
Strategic use of Big Data: implementing reference intervals for serum folate and serum cobalamin.
Observational study in Biochemia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of method-specific reference intervals for vitamin B12 and its correlation with holotranscobalamin.Biochemia medica · 2026Article
- First trimester of pregnancy TSH laboratory specific reference intervals established by an indirect method.Biochemia medica · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Defining trustworthy reference intervals (RIs) for serum folate (FOL) or serum cobalamin (VITB12) is a difficult task. The purpose of this study is to use an indirect approach from the laboratory information's system to indirectly generate RIs for FOL and VITB12. Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study was performed at a tertiary-care laboratory's hospital during 12 months. All FOL and VITB12 tests were measured using a Cobas8000 e801 system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The RIs were calculated using a non-parametric approach. The RIs established in the present study were verified by calculating the fraction of RIs that fell outside the new RIs, in two validation cohorts sampled using the direct and indirect method. Results: A total of 19,214 (FOL) and 27,420 (VITB12) results were obtained. The RIs were 4.5 nmol/L (90% confidence intervals (CI) 4.4-4.6) to 38.4 nmol/L (CI 38.3-38.5) for FOL and 140 pmol/L (CI 139-141) to 659 pmol/L (CI 657-660) for VITB12. The verification included 8,798 FOL results and 7,365 VITB12 results. For both magnitudes was acceptable since only 0.1% of FOL and 0.02% of VITB12 results fell outside the RIs. Finally, the RIs were verified using a direct method with twenty individuals. For FOL 20/20 cases and 19/20 of VITB12 cases fell within the estimated RIs. Conclusions: In summary, the use of an indirect data approach has enabled us to calculate RIs for FOL and VITB12. The RIs obtained in our study are lower than those proposed by the manufacturer for both FOL and VITB12.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.