Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974175›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Epileptogenic zone characteristics determine effectiveness of electrical transcranial stimulation in epilepsy treatment.

Maëva Daoud, Samuel Medina-Villalon, Elodie Garnier, Ionuț-Flavius Bratu, Giada Damiani, Ricardo Salvador, Fabrice Wendling, Giulio Ruffini, Christian Bénar, Francesca Pizzo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. EASEEEpilepsy currents
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maëva DaoudEpileptology Department and Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, INSERM/AMU, 13005 Marseille, France.
Samuel Medina-VillalonAPHM, Timone Hospital, Epileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, 13005 Marseille, France.
Elodie GarnierEpileptology Department and Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, INSERM/AMU, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-4369
Ionuț-Flavius BratuEpileptology Department and Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, INSERM/AMU, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-8927
Giada DamianiNeuroelectrics, Barcelona, Spain.
Ricardo SalvadorNeuroelectrics, Barcelona, Spain.
Fabrice WendlingRennes Univ, INSERM, LTSI U1099, F 35000, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2428-9665
Giulio RuffiniNeuroelectrics, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-0177
Christian BénarEpileptology Department and Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, INSERM/AMU, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3339-1306
Francesca PizzoAPHM, Timone Hospital, Epileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6345-1288
Fabrice BartolomeiAPHM, Timone Hospital, Epileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-0297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation shows promise as a non-invasive therapeutic method for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there is considerable variability in individual responses to transcranial direct current stimulation, and the factors influencing treatment effectiveness in targeted regions are not well understood. We aimed to assess how the extent and depth of the epileptogenic zone and associated networks impact patient responses to transcranial direct current stimulation therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of stereoelectroencephalography data from 23 patients participating in a personalized multichannel transcranial direct current stimulation protocol. We evaluated the extent and depth of the epileptogenic zone network, propagation zone network, and the combined network of the entire epileptogenic and propagation zones, correlating these factors with clinical response measured by the reduction in seizure frequency following repeated transcranial direct current stimulation sessions. Among the patients, 10 (43.5%) were classified as responders (R), experiencing a significant (>50%) decrease in seizure frequency, while 13 were non-responders, showing minimal improvement or increased seizure frequency. Importantly, we found a significant positive correlation between the extent of the epileptogenic zone network and changes in seizure frequency. A smaller epileptogenic zone network extent was associated with better transcranial direct current stimulation efficacy, with responders demonstrating a significantly smaller epileptogenic and propagation zones compared with non-responders. Additionally, non-responders tended to have a significantly deeper epileptogenic zone network compared with responders. Our results highlight the significant impact of the extent and depth of the epileptogenic zone network on transcranial direct current stimulation efficacy in patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Responders typically exhibited a smaller and shallower epileptogenic zone network compared with non-responders. These findings suggest that utilizing individualized epileptogenic zone network characteristics could help refine patient selection for personalized transcranial direct current stimulation protocols, potentially improving therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

electric field modelingepileptogenic zone networkmultichannel tDCSSEEGtreatment responsiveness

Identifiers

PMID39974175
PMCPMC11837341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.