Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974170›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2025

Patterns and predictors of therapeutic response to efgartigimod in acetylcholine receptor-antibody generalized myasthenia gravis subtypes.

Lei Jin, Zhangyu Zou, Qinzhou Wang, Wenshuang Zeng, Qilong Jiang, Jing Chen, Jianquan Shi, Yanyan Yu, Daojun Hong, Quantao Zeng and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04535843 (Precision Diagnosis and Prospective Cohort Study for Myasthenia Gravis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04535843 recruitingnot on this map

Precision Diagnosis and Prospective Cohort Study for Myasthenia Gravis: Multicenter Analysis in China

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHuashan HospitalRan2024 to 2028Enrolled500ConditionsMyasthenia GravisArmsBiomarkers and omics data
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Heterogeneous response to efgartigimod in real-world experience with myasthenia gravis: Predictors and treatment strategies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Lei JinHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9052-4590
Zhangyu ZouDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-1110
Qinzhou WangDepartment of Neurology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5652-3431
Wenshuang ZengDepartment of Neurology, Hongkong University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Qilong JiangDepartment of Myopathy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jianquan ShiDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yanyan YuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Daojun HongDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Quantao ZengDepartment of Neurology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Song TanDepartment of Neurology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yaoxian YueDepartment of Neurology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Zhouao ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6253-6167
Yong ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6422-8491
Xiuming GuoDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1868-8833
Lei DuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Zhongyan ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Shixiong HuangDepartment of Neurology, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5404-4664
Ying ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
Zongtai WuDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Chong YanHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianying XiHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie SongHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5298-3993
Sushan LuoHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, No. 12 Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-7568
Chongbo ZhaoHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, No. 12 Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-1418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Efgartigimod is an approved biologic for generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), which is an autoimmune disease and can potentially be life-threatening. However, the therapeutic response to efgartigimod among the acetylcholine receptor gMG (AChR-gMG) subtypes remains inconclusive. Objective: To explore the patterns and predictors for the therapeutic response to efgartigimod among AChR-gMG subtypes. Design: This prospective, observational study included AChR-gMG patients treated with efgartigimod at 15 centers in China with a follow-up for at least 20 weeks. Methods: The primary outcome was the proportion of minimal symptom expression (MSE) responders, denoted by a Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of 0 or 1 within 4 weeks and maintained for ⩾4 weeks. AChR antibody-positive MG (AChR-MG) subtypes were classified into early onset myasthenia gravis (EOMG), late-onset myasthenia gravis (LOMG), and thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis (TAMG). The predictive factors for MSE responders were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: One hundred sixteen patients were included with a median follow-up duration of 238 days (172.5-306.3). There were 50 (43.1%) patients with EOMG, 28 (24.1%) with LOMG and 38 (32.8%) with TAMG. After efgartigimod initiation, 35 (30.2%) patients were MSE responders, and the proportion of MSE responders was highest in the LOMG group (42.9%). The MG-ADL score reduction in the LOMG group was more significant than in the EOMG group by weeks 16 and 20 (both Conclusion: Our findings revealed patterns of treatment responses among AChR-gMG subtypes, with LOMG patients potentially presenting a more sustained response. These findings likely provide preliminary data for precision therapy in MG in the era of biologics. Trial registration: NCT04535843.

Indexed as

early-onsetefgartigimodgeneralized myasthenia gravislate-onsettherapeutic responsethymoma

Identifiers

PMID39974170
PMCPMC11837134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.