ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Potential benefits and challenges of simulation-based neonatal resuscitation competition: A survey analysis of provincial competition in China.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training has been implemented worldwide with good educational and clinical results. Simulation-based competition (SBC), as an innovative derivative of neonatal resuscitation training, has been practiced recently but its potential effectiveness and challenges of competition are rarely studied. We tested the hypothesis that after SBC, participants could improve compliance with NRP® algorithm and teamwork, achieve lower stress and higher confidence in neonatal resuscitation. Methods: In February 2023, 108 health care providers in 27 teams from different regional centres participated in provincial SBC. Each team consisted of 4 members (NICU physician [lead], NICU nurse, midwife and obstetrician). The teams were to complete a resuscitation scenario (16 min) and their performance was evaluated. All participants were encouraged to take part in a post-resuscitation questionnaire survey voluntarily immediately after the scenarios finished. Demographic characteristics and questionnaire results of participants were collected, including the confidence and perceived stress levels before and after the competition. Results: Ninety-eight (90.7%) participants completed the survey with 114 post-resuscitation questionnaire surveys. Participants perceived top benefits of SBC including improved compliance with NRP® algorithm, technical skills and teamwork, with the least benefit in improving self-confidence (vs. other benefits, Conclusions: Participants in SBC might be benefited with improved compliance with NRP® algorithm, technical skills and teamwork. However, the impact, influence and sustainability of these benefits are uncertain. Further research is needed to explore ways to improve self-confidence and decrease stress in neonatal resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.