ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
External Validation, Re-Calibration, and Extension of a Prediction Model of Early Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Children using Multi-Center Data.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among children with critical illness and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Risk prediction models designed for clinical decision support implementation offer an opportunity to identify and proactively mitigate AKI risks. Existing models have been primarily validated on single-center data, owing partly to the lack of appropriately detailed multicenter datasets. Objective: To determine the accuracy of a single-center model to predict new AKI at 72 hours of ICU admission across two multicenter datasets and extend this model to improve prediction accuracy while maintaining acceptable alert burden. Derivation and Validation Cohorts: We separately derived models in two datasets: PEDSNET-VPS, created through the linkage of PEDSnet electronic health record (EHR) extraction with Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS); and the PICU Data Collaborative dataset, created through EHR extraction and harmonization from eight participating institutions. Derivation datasets comprised temporal and location-specific spit of these datasets (80%), while the holdout test split comprised the remaining (20%). Prediction Model: We recalibrated an existing single-center model and measured discrimination and accuracy. We then add features guided by precision and recall measures. All features were available at 12 hours of ICU admission. We measure discrimination and accuracy at multiple cut-points and identify the features contributing most to the risk score. Results: In two datasets comprising 186,540 ICU admissions, we report an incidence of early AKI of 2.2 - 2.7%. Initial recalibration of an existing single-center model demonstrated poor discrimination (AUROC 0.60 - 0.78). Following the addition of new features, we report higher AUROC values of 0.79 - 0.80 and AUPRC values of 0.13 - 0.21 in both datasets. We report accuracy at several cutpoints as well as cross-validate between datasets. Conclusions: In this first use of two new multicenter datasets, we report improved discrimination and accuracy in a model designed specifically for implementation, balancing sensitivity and precision to predict patients at risk for AKI development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.