Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974106›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Time-dependent relationship between urinary biomarkers of nucleic acid oxidation and colorectal cancer risk.

Yingya Zhao, Marina S Nogueira, Ginger L Milne, Yu-Tang Gao, Qiuyin Cai, Qing Lan, Haoyang Yi, Nathaniel Rothman, Xiao-Ou Shu, Wei Zheng and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yingya Zhao
Marina S NogueiraORCID 0000-0001-8092-928X
Ginger L Milne
Yu-Tang Gao
Qiuyin Cai
Qing Lan
Haoyang Yi
Nathaniel Rothman
Xiao-Ou Shu
Wei Zheng
Qingxia Chen
Gong Yang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRandomized controlled trials have failed to validate that neutralizing oxidative stress (OxS) through antioxidant supplementation reduces cancer risk. This study aims to prospectively investigate whether the relationship between systemic OxS and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk changes over the course of cancer development.

methodsThis study utilized a nested case-control design in two Shanghai cohorts for primary analysis and one US cohort for replication analysis. During a median follow-up of 15.1 years in the Shanghai cohorts, 1938 incident CRC cases were identified and matched to one control each. In the US cohort, 285 incident CRC cases were included with two matched controls per case. Systemic OxS was assessed by urinary markers of DNA oxidation (8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine [8-oxo-dG]) and RNA oxidation (7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-guanosine [8-oxo-Guo]) using UPLC-MS/MS assays. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for CRC risk were calculated.

resultsAfter adjusting for potential confounders, we observed an inversion association between OxS markers and CRC risk in the Shanghai cohorts, which was independently replicated in the US cohort. Moreover, the inverse association was time-dependent, manifesting only for CRC cases diagnosed within 5 years of enrollment. ORs (95% CI) for CRC at the 10th and 90th percentiles of 8-oxo-dG levels, relative to the median, were 1.87 (1.39 to 2.53) and 0.48 (0.37 to 0.63), respectively, demonstrating an approximate 4-fold difference in risk between the two groups, with

conclusionThis novel finding of an inverse and time-dependent relationship between systemic OxS and CRC risk, if further confirmed, may provide a new perspective for revisiting redox-based chemoprevention. CONTEXT:

Identifiers

PMID39974106
PMCPMC11838937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.