ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Development of a Claims-Based Computable Phenotype for Ulcerative Colitis Flares.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Aims: Several conditions exist that do not have their own unique diagnosis code in widely-used clinical terminologies, making them difficult to track and study. Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is one such condition. There is no automated method to identify patients admitted for ASUC from observational data, nor any specific billing or diagnosis code for ASUC. Accurate, automated, large-scale identification of hospital admissions for non-coded conditions like ASUC may enable further research into them. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with a history of ulcerative colitis (UC) admitted to a single academic institution from 2014-2019. Clinicians at our institution performed a chart review of these admissions to determine if each was due to a true episode of ASUC or not. Logistic regression, random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) models were trained upon administrative claims data for all admissions. Results: 268 ASUC admissions and 3,725 non-ASUC admissions among UC patients were included. Our RF model exhibited the best performance, correctly classifying 95.5% of admissions as either ASUC or non-ASUC, with a validation AUROC of 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.98; AUPRC 0.73). The model had a sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 96.5%. The five most important features in the model were endoscopy of sigmoid colon, length of stay, age, endoscopy of rectum, and abdominal x-ray. Conclusions: There is currently no modality by which ASUC, which does not have its own unique diagnosis code, can be identified from claims databases in a scalable fashion for research or clinical purposes. We have developed a machine learning-based model that identifies clinically significant ASUC and reliably distinguishes them from admissions for non-ASUC reasons among UC patients. The ability to automatically curate large, accurate datasets of non-coded conditions like ASUC episodes can serve as the basis of large-scale analyses to maximize our ability to learn from real-world data, enable future research, and better understand these diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.