Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39974062›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records.

Ruichen Rong, Zifan Gu, Hongyin Lai, Tanna L Nelson, Tony Keller, Clark Walker, Kevin W Jin, Catherine Chen, Ann Marie Navar, Ferdinand Velasco and 4 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ruichen RongQuantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, USA.
Zifan GuQuantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8024-2629
Hongyin LaiQuantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, USA.
Tanna L NelsonTexas Health Resources, Arlington, Texas.
Tony KellerTexas Health Resources, Arlington, Texas.
Clark WalkerTexas Health Resources, Arlington, Texas.
Kevin W JinQuantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, USA.
Catherine ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Ann Marie NavarDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Ferdinand VelascoTexas Health Resources, Arlington, Texas.
Eric D PetersonDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Guanghua XiaoQuantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, USA.
Donghan M YangQuantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, USA.
Yang XieQuantitative Biomedical Research Center, Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, USA.

Funding

MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH TRAINING AT YALET15LM007056 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Bender Gerstein, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 1987 to 2026
$22.2M
Deep Learning Image Analysis Algorithms to Improve Oral Cancer Risk Assessment for Oral Potentially Malignant DisordersR01DE030656 · NIDCR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PICKERING, CURTIS, XIAO, GUANGHUA · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
Novel computational approaches to predict drug response and combination effectsR35GM136375 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIE, YANG · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Developing computational algorithms for histopathological image analysisR01GM140012 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIAO, GUANGHUA · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
Informatics Tools To Analyze And Model Whole Slide Image Data At The Single Cell LevelU01CA249245 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIAO, GUANGHUA · 2021 to 2023
$1.5M
Antibiotic Resistance Determination Utilizing Machine LearningU01AI169298 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GREENBERG, DAVID ELIHU, ZHAN, XIAOWEI · 2022 to 2024
$1.4M
Integrative Analysis to Identify Regulation Targets of RNA-Binding ProteinsR01GM115473 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIE, YANG · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA249245NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI169298NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE030656NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115473NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140012NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136375NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Recent advances in deep learning show significant potential in analyzing continuous monitoring electronic health records (EHR) data for clinical outcome prediction. We aim to develop a Transformer-based, Encounter-level Clinical Outcome (TECO) model to predict mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) using inpatient EHR data. Materials and Methods: TECO was developed using multiple baseline and time-dependent clinical variables from 2579 hospitalized COVID-19 patients to predict ICU mortality, and was validated externally in an ARDS cohort (n=2799) and a sepsis cohort (n=6622) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV. Model performance was evaluated based on area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) and compared with Epic Deterioration Index (EDI), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Results: In the COVID-19 development dataset, TECO achieved higher AUC (0.89-0.97) across various time intervals compared to EDI (0.86-0.95), RF (0.87-0.96), and XGBoost (0.88-0.96). In the two MIMIC testing datasets (EDI not available), TECO yielded higher AUC (0.65-0.76) than RF (0.57-0.73) and XGBoost (0.57-0.73). In addition, TECO was able to identify clinically interpretable features that were correlated with the outcome. Discussion: TECO outperformed proprietary metrics and conventional machine learning models in predicting ICU mortality among COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: TECO demonstrates a strong capability for predicting ICU mortality using continuous monitoring data. While further validation is needed, TECO has the potential to serve as a powerful early warning tool across various diseases in inpatient settings.

Indexed as

continuous monitoring dataCOVID-19EHRICUTransformer

Identifiers

PMID39974062
PMCPMC11838940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.