ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Comparing Esri ArcGIS and SAS Geocoding Approaches: Test case with 3,238 Wisconsin addresses.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This report describes a comparison of two geocoding methods used by the Cohorts for Environmental Exposures and Cancer Risks (CEECR) consortium: ArcGIS Geocoding by Esri and the SAS GEOCODE Procedure. The goal of this report is to determine the comparability of data sets that employ different approaches for linking survey data with spatial surrogates of exposure to environmental and socioeconomic factors. ArcGIS and SAS GEOCODE were selected as two platforms for this comparison because both programs are being used by one or more CEECR cohort study teams and they can be used locally offline. The latter minimizes confidentiality issues related to online data linkages. Residential addresses from 3,238 Wisconsin residents in the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.