ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Inhibitory properties of a latent inhibitor after its compound preexposure with several novel stimuli: evidence from human conditioning.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Latent inhibition refers to the retardation in learning an association between a target stimulus and an outcome when the target stimulus has been pre-exposed in the absence of consequences. The inhibitory properties of latent inhibitors have been the subject of controversy, as standard latent inhibition training-consisting of pre-exposure to the target stimulus alone-does not provide the latent inhibitor with the ability to pass a summation test, a key criterion for demonstrating genuine inhibition. However, previous research with animals has shown that a specific pre-exposure procedure, in which the target stimulus (A) is presented in compound with successive novel stimuli (An1, An2, An3…), can endow the target with sufficient inhibitory properties to pass both retardation and summation tests. To examine whether this phenomenon generalizes to humans, we conducted two experiments using a video game-based conditioning paradigm. Experiment 1 demonstrated that this compound pre-exposure schedule enhanced the retardation effect compared to standard pre-exposure or control conditions. Experiment 2 revealed that the target stimulus pre-exposed with novel stimuli significantly reduced responding when tested in compound with an excitatory conditioned stimulus, thus passing the summation test. These results suggest that compound pre-exposure facilitates the acquisition of inhibitory properties in humans, consistent with findings from animal studies. The findings are discussed within the framework of Hall-Rodríguez model, emphasizing the role of expectancy violation during pre-exposure in strengthening inhibitory associations. Implications for clinical applications, particularly in enhancing exposure therapy for anxiety disorders, are also considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.