Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39973935›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Comparison of self-collected and healthcare worker-collected rectovaginal swabs for group B streptococcus detection in pregnancy using PCR with a commercial collection-enrichment device.

Iva Kukovica, Neža Omahen, Nika Klobučar, Martina Bučar, Anita Franko Rutar, Tina Perme, Miha Lučovnik, Samo Jeverica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Iva Kukovica *Department of Perinatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Neža Omahen *National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Maribor, Slovenia.
Nika KlobučarNational Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Maribor, Slovenia.
Martina BučarCommunity Health Center Novo mesto, Novo mesto, Slovenia.
Anita Franko RutarCommunity Health Center Trebnje, Trebnje, Slovenia.
Tina PermeDepartment of Perinatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Miha LučovnikDepartment of Perinatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Samo JevericaNational Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Universal screening for the detection of group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women was recently introduced in Slovenia. The aim of our study was to determine whether self-collection of rectovaginal swabs is a valid alternative to collection by healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted between June and November 2023. A total of 227 pregnant women (aged 20 to 44 years) from the University Medical Center Ljubljana ( Results: Overall, GBS was detected in 18% (95% CI 13-23%; Discussion: Self-collection of rectovaginal swabs during pregnancy is a good alternative to HCW-collected swabs. PCR from enrichment broth was better for the detection of GBS compared to enrichment culture. Majority of women preferred swabs taken by HCWs.

Indexed as

chromogenic agarenrichment culturegroup B streptococcusPCRpregnancyscreeningself-collection

Identifiers

PMID39973935
PMCPMC11835839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.