SynthesisIndian journal of pharmacology2024
Aspirin for prophylaxis of VTE in patients with Hip/ Knee replacement: Systematic review and Meta-analysis of Non-Randomized studies.
Synthesis in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedics and traumatology: Austrian interdisciplinary consensus statement 2026].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAspirin as an agent for thromboprophylaxis in patients with total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) is gaining a lot of importance owing to its efficacy and safety in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) complications. The current guidelines do not recommend aspirin over other anticoagulants as the data from the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails (RCTs) lacked a significant sample to draw conclusive results. The present study was aimed to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies (NRSs) to determine the effect of aspirin as prophylaxis for VTE. A complete electronic search was conducted at PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar for relevant articles published till March 2021. Any postsurgical VTE event (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) is considered the primary outcome and adverse events as secondary outcomes. Both efficacy and safety outcomes were reported as pooled risk estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) with a level of significance at P < 0.05. A total of 21 studies were identified for the analysis. The overall risk of occurrence of VTE among the patients taking aspirin was not significantly different from anticoagulants (risk ratio [RR]: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.52-1.15). Patients who underwent THR had a higher risk for VTE with aspirin (RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.35-1.61), whereas the patients who underwent TKR showed a lower risk of VTE with aspirin (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75-0.85). Meta-analysis of NRS advocates the role of aspirin as a prophylactic agent for VTE, especially for patients who are in need for TKR. Further RCTs are required to reestablish the role of aspirin, especially in patients undergoing THR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.