Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39973826›Full record

Observational studyIndian journal of pharmacology2024

Comparative analysis of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of betahistine alone, caroverine alone, and caroverine plus ginkgo biloba in moderate tinnitus.

Laxmipriya Nayak, Suhasini Dehury, Subhalaxmi Rautray, Lorika Sahu, Debadutta Sahu

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laxmipriya NayakDepartment of Pharmacology, Jajati Keshari Medical College and Hospital, Jajpur, India.
Suhasini DehuryDepartment of Pharmacology, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, India.
Subhalaxmi RautrayENT, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, India.
Lorika SahuDepartment of Pharmacology, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, India.
Debadutta SahuENT, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTinnitus or "phantom sound" continues to be a significant health problem without a uniformly accepted treatment. Numerous pharmaceutical options have been investigated, but satisfactory results are yet to be obtained.

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to study and compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of caroverine alone, caroverine combined with ginkgo biloba and betahistine alone in patients of moderate tinnitus. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective, observational, hospital-based study, wherein 72 patients were distributed equally across three groups - Group A received caroverine 20 mg twice daily, Group B received caroverine 20 mg combined with ginkgo biloba 120 mg twice daily, and Group C received betahistine 8 mg thrice daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy was zanalyzed assessing the changes in tinnitus handicap inventory (THI), tinnitus functional index (TFI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and pure tone audiometry values from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The cost-effectiveness analysis was done at the end of 12 weeks zutilizing the incremental costeffectiveness ratio. The Chi-square test and one-way ANOVA were used to evaluate the statistical significance of the results.

resultsThe reduction in the THI, TFI and VAS scores was maximum in Group B followed by Group A and Group C. All the drugs were well-tolerated, and the adverse effects encountered were mild and nonserious. Combination therapy of caroverine with gingkgo biloba was the most expensive.

conclusionCaroverine and ginkgo biloba combination therapy was the most effective in reducing the handicap of moderate tinnitus.

Indexed as

BetahistineGinkgo bilobaPlant ExtractsTinnitusAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhytotherapyProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBetahistinePlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID39973826
PMCPMC11913329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.