ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2025
Implementing Supported Employment in the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration - Experiences from employment specialists and critical implementation issues.
Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundSupported Employment (SE) is a widely used methodology for work inclusion, with a documented positive effect for several user groups with difficulties to enter the competitive labor market. In 2017, SE was implemented in the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration (NLWA), provided by employment specialists for labor market inclusion.ObjectivesTo examine experiences of employment specialists adopting the SE-methodology and the coping strategies developed to handle the workload, and to identify critical issues in the implementation of SE.MethodsSix focus groups with employment specialists at two local NLWA-offices were conducted at baseline, and three, 12 and 18 months after. Sessions were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed.ResultsParticipants showed a growing confidence in their own skill set. Coping strategies to encounter challenges included achieving a better balance between available resources and allocated workload, avoiding unnoticed dropout of employment seekers, and developing an awareness for the 'employability' of employment seekers. Critical issues included the increasing feeling of getting detached from teammates, a constant lack of time for satisfactory task performance, and growing discomfort with organizing the workload according to set efficiency parameters, instead of standards for good SE. Several employment specialists showed signs of professional burnout.ConclusionParticipants became quickly familiar with the SE-methodology. They became subject to significant wear and the loss of a career perspective as an employment specialist, resulting in high turn-over. The critical issues identified must be addressed to make SE in the NLWA sustainable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.