Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39973582›Full record

ReviewJournal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine2024

The salaried PM&R physician.

Joline E Brandenburg, Jeffrey S Brault

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Patient wellness is linked to physician wellness.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joline E BrandenburgDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jeffrey S BraultDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breadth of medical practice for a physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) physician is quite extensive. Not only are practice areas quite different among PM&R physicians, but practice settings, procedures, and salary models also vary significantly. For PM&R residents and fellows who are making career decisions regarding specialization versus general practice and/or in the process of negotiating contracts, salary is a significant influence in their decision of clinical practice. Physician payment models may create inadvertent bias against women, those seeking less than full time clinical employment, and those interested in an academic career. In this review and commentary, we will discuss the more common payment models encountered, with a focus on a fixed salary payment model. We will also discuss our experiences as pediatric and adult PM&R providers in a salaried payment model at a not-for-profit academic institution.

Indexed as

Physical and Rehabilitation MedicinePhysiciansSalaries and Fringe BenefitsCareer ChoiceFemaleHumanspayment modelpediatricphysical medicine and rehabilitationsalary

Identifiers

PMID39973582
PMCPMC13292618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.