ReviewJournal of separation science2025
Recent Advances in Bioanalysis of Cephalosporins Toward Green Sample Preparation.
Review in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation hybrid bioanalytical platforms and clinical integration of TDM technologies for precision monitoring to optimize last-resort antibiotic therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence as a Scientific Copilot in Analytical Chemistry: Transforming How We Write, Review, and Publish.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Development of a Capsule Phase Microextraction Protocol for the Determination of Monomers Released from Dental Resins in Cola Drinks Analyzed by High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography Coupled to UV.Journal of separation science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review highlights recent advances in the bioanalysis of cephalosporins using liquid chromatographic methods, focusing on green sample preparation (GSP) techniques. Cephalosporins, a class of β-lactam antibiotics, are critical in combating bacterial infections but present challenges related to drug resistance and toxicity. This article evaluates various sample preparation methods, including solid-phase extraction, solid-phase microextraction, and protein precipitation, which have been employed in the extraction and quantification of cephalosporins from biological matrices. Special attention is given to the optimization of critical parameters, such as pH, extraction solvents, and purification techniques to maximize analytes' recovery and sensitivity. Emerging trends in GSP, such as the use of molecularly imprinted polymers and miniaturized processing devices, are also discussed. The review underscores the growing importance of integrating environmentally friendly approaches in cephalosporin bioanalysis, paving the way for future innovations in bioanalytical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.