ReviewJournal of Parkinson's disease2025
Addressing the need for standardization of symptomatic medication documentation in Parkinson's disease clinical research: A call to action.
Review in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Optimal approach to standardized documentation in epilepsy clinics: A scoping review.Epilepsia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with Parkinson's disease (PD) are prescribed a variety of medications to mitigate symptoms and improve their quality of life. These symptomatic therapies cover a range of pharmacological classes, including classical dopaminergic treatments, other antiparkinsonian agents, and pharmacotherapies for non-PD conditions. Often, medications are prescribed for concomitant use and in increasing doses, particularly as the disease progresses. Documentation of these interventions in clinical trials is necessary to accurately capture medication usage, compare medication utilization across different studies, understand factors contributing to experimental therapeutic response, and analyze clinical trial data in a precise manner. At the present time, there is no current international standard for how these medications are documented within clinical trials. As a case example, we will highlight medication use documentation in a large international multicenter observational study commonly used as a reference for design of clinical trials. This review aims to raise awareness within the scientific community of the importance of proper medication documentation and the need for standardization to harmonize prescriptive practices, improve treatment interpretability, and perform consistently robust analyses from clinical trials data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.