Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39973486›Full record

ReviewJournal of Parkinson's disease2025

Addressing the need for standardization of symptomatic medication documentation in Parkinson's disease clinical research: A call to action.

Mikayla Spott, Monica Javidnia, Anne Pedata, Martijn Müller, Laura Carrillo, Tanya Simuni, Gennaro Pagano, Kevin Kwok, Klaus Romero, Diane Stephenson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mikayla SpottCritical Path for Parkinson's Consortium, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0482-8925
Monica JavidniaDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3787-8672
Anne PedataCritical Path for Parkinson's Consortium, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Martijn MüllerCritical Path for Parkinson's Consortium, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1133-7202
Laura CarrilloCritical Path for Parkinson's Consortium, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7359-4670
Tanya SimuniNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gennaro PaganoUniversity of Exeter Medical School, London, UK.
Kevin KwokParkinson's Patient Activist, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7691-9143
Klaus RomeroCritical Path for Parkinson's Consortium, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Diane StephensonCritical Path for Parkinson's Consortium, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

FDA HHS U18 FD005320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with Parkinson's disease (PD) are prescribed a variety of medications to mitigate symptoms and improve their quality of life. These symptomatic therapies cover a range of pharmacological classes, including classical dopaminergic treatments, other antiparkinsonian agents, and pharmacotherapies for non-PD conditions. Often, medications are prescribed for concomitant use and in increasing doses, particularly as the disease progresses. Documentation of these interventions in clinical trials is necessary to accurately capture medication usage, compare medication utilization across different studies, understand factors contributing to experimental therapeutic response, and analyze clinical trial data in a precise manner. At the present time, there is no current international standard for how these medications are documented within clinical trials. As a case example, we will highlight medication use documentation in a large international multicenter observational study commonly used as a reference for design of clinical trials. This review aims to raise awareness within the scientific community of the importance of proper medication documentation and the need for standardization to harmonize prescriptive practices, improve treatment interpretability, and perform consistently robust analyses from clinical trials data.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicDocumentationParkinson DiseaseHumansAntiparkinson AgentsantiparkinsonianscollaborationPPMIstandards

Identifiers

PMID39973486
PMCPMC13347419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.