Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39973478›Full record

ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2025

Improving recruitment and retention of people with Parkinson's disease to clinical studies: A scoping review.

Rebecca Petty, Veena Agarwal, Jennifer Allison, Sandra Bartolomeu-Pires, Michèle Bartlett, Timothy Boey, Rebecca Croucher, Helen Collins, Sally Collins, Emma Davies and 13 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Rebecca PettyUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7734-6905
Veena AgarwalUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jennifer AllisonLead Matron R&D, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Sandra Bartolomeu-PiresUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3711-9040
Michèle BartlettUK Expert by Experience, UK.
Timothy BoeyUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1601-4821
Rebecca CroucherNational Institute for Health Research, Clinical Research Network Wessex, UK.
Helen CollinsNational Institute for Health Research, Clinical Research Network Thames Valley and South Midlands, UK.
Sally CollinsUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Emma DaviesUK Parkinson's Clinical Studies Group, Sheffield, UK.
Joy DuffenCure Parkinson's, London, UK.
Romy Ellis-DoyleUniversity College London, London, UK.
Cristina Gonzalez-RoblesUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6809-0127
Jemma InchesUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, UK.
Georgia MillsUniversity College London, London, UK.
Sheila WonnacottUK Expert by Experience, UK.
Thomas FoltynieUniversity College London, London, UK.
Victoria AllgarUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5228-2623
Tom ThompsonUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Camille B CarrollUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7472-953X
Stephen MullinUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Marie Louise-ZeisslerUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6232-4284
EJS ACT-PD Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundTimely recruitment and effective retention of participants are challenging for clinical Parkinson's disease (PD) research studies. Not achieving this can affect delivery costs and bias results.ObjectiveTo identify successful recruitment and retention methodologies for clinical research studies in PD.MethodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review using a Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study design (PICOS) framework to search and screen literature within five databases for published quantitative and mixed methods studies evaluating recruitment and retention strategies of interventional and observational trials in PD.ResultsSearches identified 4608 records, of which six papers covering eight studies were included in the review following screening for eligibility. No papers on retention strategies were found that met eligibility criteria. Effective strategies for rapid recruitment included research registries and trial finders (n = 3), digital marketing campaigns (n = 3), site recruitment support (n = 1) and multiple referral sources (n = 1). Recruitment diversity was increased by online campaigns, mandatory 10% minority targets set by funders and supplemental site funding.ConclusionsThis scoping review has identified methods that can be used to increase the rate and diversity of recruitment to PD clinical studies. Retention methodologies are under-researched.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicParkinson DiseasePatient SelectionHumansclinical trialobservational studyParkinson's diseasepatient recruitment

Identifiers

PMID39973478
PMCPMC13347406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.