Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39973401›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuromuscular diseases2025

Systematic literature review of the impact of spinal muscular atrophy therapies on bulbar function.

Katlyn McGrattan, Katie Walsh, Lesa Mehl, Simarjeet Kaur, Keith W Dilly

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katlyn McGrattanDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Katie WalshDepartment of Rehabilitation, Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lesa MehlBiomedical Research, Novartis, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-5460-4493
Simarjeet KaurNovartis, Madhapur / Hyderabad, India.
Keith W DillyNovartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Bannockburn, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImprovement and maintenance of bulbar function are important goals of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), but standardized and validated measures for assessing bulbar function do not exist, nor does a widely accepted definition of bulbar function in SMA. As such, the impact of DMTs on bulbar function has not yet been comprehensively evaluated.

objectiveWe conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify evidence about the impact of DMTs for SMA on bulbar function.

methodsWe used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines to conduct this review. Embase

resultsWe identified 51 studies (across 83 publications) that evaluated SMA DMTs and bulbar function for more than 1600 patients. The ability to feed orally, the ability to tolerate liquids, and the need for nutrition support were commonly reported. Most infants treated with any DMT before SMA symptom onset preserved bulbar function. Infants, children, and adults treated after SMA symptom onset experienced variable results in terms of bulbar function outcomes.

conclusionsThe definition and assessment of bulbar function are not standardized. Therefore, the tools, scales, methods, and timing used for bulbar function assessments varied among studies. Larger prospective studies using standardized and age-based assessments with longer follow-up periods are needed to assess the clinical stability of bulbar function for patients with SMA who receive DMTs.

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalChildHumansbulbar functiondisease-modifying treatmentnusinersenonasemnogene abeparvovecrisdiplamspinal muscular atrophysystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID39973401
PMCPMC13142877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.