Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39973117›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2025

Difference between estimated and actual body weight in an intensive care unit-A service evaluation.

Jonas Monsees, Fionnuala Staunton, Aidan Morris, Tracy Grace Sarmiento Paredes, Sneha Sebastian, Tom O'Connor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas MonseesCNM II Post Anaesthetic Critical Care Unit, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1681-5792
Fionnuala StauntonCritical Care Dietican, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Aidan MorrisUniversity Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Tracy Grace Sarmiento ParedesRN 4East ICU, University of Florida Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Sneha SebastianPACU, Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane City, Australia.
Tom O'ConnorSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, RCSI, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5948-0975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actual body weight (ABW) is important for drug dosing and calculating nutritional requirements. The aim of this study is to establish the difference between ABW and estimated body weight in a cohort of ICU patients. Our service evaluation compared 100 patients whose weights were initially estimated by staff, and if able by patients also. Weights were then measured. We also compared ABW to Ideal and Predicted Body Weights. We had a ⟩10% error margin in 36% of estimated weights and a ⟩ 20% error margin in 11% of estimated weights. Median error for patients self-estimating their body weight was 4.14% (IQR 1.39-7.74). For patients that were able to estimate their weight the median error margin was 4.14% (IQR 1.39-7.74). The Median difference between ABW and Ideal Body Weight was 18.57% (IQR 9.78-36.57) and 18.15% for ABW and Predicted Body Weight (IQR 9.13-36.58). Estimated body weights should only be used when weighing patients is contraindicated. Patients are more accurate at estimating their own body weight than staff. It is best practice to accurately measure body weight in ICU patients.

Indexed as

Body WeightIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedCritical CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBody Weightcritical carecritical care nursingDieteticsIdeal Body WeightMesh terms: Weights and MeasuresPharmacy

Identifiers

PMID39973117
PMCPMC11840395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.