SynthesisMolecular oncology2025
Integration of single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing data reveals the prognostic potential of epithelial gene markers for prostate cancer.
Synthesis in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Bioinformatics and Machine Learning Analysis Identifies Novel Molecular Biomarkers in Prostate Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Integrating single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analyses to explore key lactylation-related genes in benign prostatic hyperplasia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integration of Bulk and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analyses in Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Unravelling TPX2-centered co-expression networks as key drivers of aggressive prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prognostic transcriptomic signatures for prostate cancer (PCa) often overlook the cellular origin of expression changes, an important consideration given the heterogeneity of the disorder. Current clinicopathological factors inadequately predict biochemical recurrence, a critical indicator guiding post-treatment strategies following radical prostatectomy. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis of four large-scale PCa datasets and found 33 previously reported PCa-associated genes to be consistently up-regulated in prostate tumours. By analysing single-cell RNA-sequencing data, we found these genes predominantly as markers in epithelial cells. Subsequently, we applied 97 advanced machine-learning algorithms across five PCa cohorts and developed an 11-gene epithelial expression signature. This signature robustly predicted biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and stratified patients into distinct risk categories, with high-risk patients showing worse survival and altered immune cell populations. The signature outperformed traditional clinical parameters in larger cohorts and was overall superior to published PCa signatures for BCRFS. By analysing peripheral blood data, four of our signature genes showed potential as biomarkers for radiation response in patients with localised cancer and effectively stratified castration-resistant patients for overall survival. In conclusion, this study developed a novel epithelial gene-expression signature that enhanced BCRFS prediction and enabled effective risk stratification compared to existing clinical- and gene-expression-derived prognostic tools. Furthermore, a set of genes from the signature demonstrated potential utility in peripheral blood, a tissue amenable to minimally invasive sampling in a primary care setting, offering significant prognostic value for PCa patients without requiring a tumour biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.