ArticleHIV medicine2025
Associations between country of birth, migration status and engagement in HIV care among gay and bisexual men living with HIV in Australia, 2019-2022.
Article in HIV medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Migration Status and HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Among Gay and Bisexual Men and Non-binary People in Australia: Results of a National Cross-Sectional Survey.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Associations between country of birth, migration status and engagement in HIV care among gay and bisexual men living with HIV in Australia, 2019-2022.HIV medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the last decade, while HIV diagnoses have declined among Australian-born gay and bisexual men (GBM), they have declined much less among migrant GBM, with recently arrived GBM facing particular challenges, such as access to HIV treatment. This study assessed HIV care cascade (treatment) outcomes among GBM living with HIV in Australia by migration status.
methodsData were collected in national cross-sectional behavioural surveillance surveys during 2019-2022. HIV cascade outcomes were stratified by country of birth and length of residency in Australia, examining HIV clinical appointments in the previous year, being on antiretroviral treatment (ART) and achieving an undetectable viral load. Percentages were calculated with the previous cascade step as the corresponding denominator.
resultsBetween 2019 and 2022, 32 236 GBM completed surveys, including 2533 (7.9%) people living with HIV (PLWH). Among 2188 PLWH reporting migration/residency status, 72.2% were Australian-born, 13.3% were from high-income English-speaking countries, 13.0% were non-recently arrived migrant GBM from other countries and 1.5% were recently arrived in Australia (<2 years). Median ages for the four groups were 50, 51, 41 and 34 years, respectively. Recently arrived PLWH were the most likely to be recently diagnosed (<2 years, 15.2% vs. <5% in the other groups). The HIV cascade of care, treatment, and viral suppression differed by migration status (p < 0.001): Australian-born, 92.5%, 96.9% and 94.6%, respectively; born in high-income-English-speaking countries, 91.8%, 97.4%,9 8.9%; non-recently arrived, 93.7%, 95.1%, 96.8%; and recently-arrived, 90.9%, 90.0%, 100%. Recently-arrived PLWH were less likely to be on treatment, but all those on treatment achieved viral suppression.
conclusionsEngaging and supporting recently arrived PLWH in Australia to access ART and relinking PLWH disengaged from care remains crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.