ArticleClinical genetics2025
The Natural Course of Bosch-Boonstra-Schaaf Optic Atrophy Syndrome.
Article in Clinical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Impact of Comprehensive WES/WGS Testing Beyond Common Genetic Causes in Hereditary Optic Atrophy.Clinical genetics · 2026Article
- A de novo NR2F1 c.330 C > A variant in Bosch-Boonstra-Schaaf optic atrophy syndrome presenting with early-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Second Prenatal Diagnosis of Bosch-Boonstra-Schaaf Optic Atrophy Syndrome in a Fetus With a 5q14.3q15 Deletion: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Language and Cognitive Features in a Girl with Bosch-Boonstra-Schaaf Optic Atrophy Syndrome.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
- Case Report: AFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(Likely) pathogenic variants in NR2F1 are associated with Bosch-Boonstra-Schaaf optic atrophy syndrome (BBSOAS, OMIM #615722), a rare neurodevelopmental disorder. Patients present with a variety of symptoms, including intellectual disability, developmental delay, visual impairment, muscular hypotonia, seizures, and/or autistic features. Since it was first described in 2014, the phenotype has steadily expanded. However, there is limited information regarding the natural course of the disorder. Here, we present data on genetic variants and phenotype development of 47 individuals who responded to our questionnaire. A questionnaire was developed to assess the phenotype more comprehensively and to better understand the course of symptoms. In addition, families sent medical documents and photographs. To investigate the genotype-phenotype correlation in our cohort, we compared clinical features of two genotypically distinct groups (variants in the DNA-binding domain (DBD, n = 17) versus variants elsewhere in the gene (n = 30)). We observed a range of common symptoms including developmental delay, muscular hypotonia, optic atrophy, nystagmus, strabismus, autistic features, and thin corpus callosum on brain MRI. Overall, more improvement than worsening was reported. Individuals with variants in the DBD showed a higher prevalence of severe clinical features, such as infantile spasms (46.7% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.002) or nonverbality (50% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.0004), age at diagnosis was statistically significantly different between the two genotypic groups (mean 4.7 years vs. 8.9 years, p = 0.048). Our study confirms characteristic clinical features of BBSOAS. Variants in the DBD are associated with a more severe clinical phenotype. We found no evidence that the disease progresses; rather, several symptoms are reported to improve over time. However, prospective longitudinal studies are needed to further investigate disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.