ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025
Vascular Microphysiological System for Investigating Endothelial Barrier Function During Organ Preservation and Reperfusion.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermodynamic Principles of Emerging Cryopreservation Technologies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Intestinal stem cells as innate immune sentinels: coupling environmental sensing to epithelial adaptation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Pillar arrays as tunable interfacial barriers for microphysiological systems.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Understanding Fast and Slow Signal Changes in a Competitive Particle-Based Continuous Biosensor.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Vascular Microphysiological System for Investigating Endothelial Barrier Function During Organ Preservation and Reperfusion.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endothelial cell damage after cold preservation and reperfusion injury causes deterioration of the endothelial barrier and ultimately results in edema, leading to transplant failure. Here, a vascular microphysiological system (MPS) is introduced as a testbed to investigate the combinational effect of thermal and fluid perturbations (i.e., wall shear stress) on human endothelial barrier function. Two methods of organ storage are compared: isochoric supercooling (ISC) preservation, which prevents ice formation at subzero temperatures; and, the standard clinical protocol of static cold storage (SCS) at 4 °C. Integrating electrical impedance measurements on chip allow real-time monitoring and quantification of barrier function during preservation and reperfusion protocols. Isochoric supercooling preservation enables longer periods of preservation with superior recovery of barrier function during reperfusion, and has lower metabolic activities compared to static cold storage. Genomic analysis reveals injury and recovery mechanisms at the molecular level for the different preservation and reperfusion conditions. The multifunctional vascular microphysiological system provides a physiologically relevant in vitro model recapitulating ischemia-reperfusion injury to the endothelium. The vascular MPS has potential for optimizing organ preservation protocols, ultimately improving organ transplant viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.