Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972937›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025

Vascular Microphysiological System for Investigating Endothelial Barrier Function During Organ Preservation and Reperfusion.

Yongdeok Kim, Ishan Goswami, Elisabeth Gill, S Reza Mahmoodi, Anthony N Consiglio, Jazmin Velazquez, Gabriel Nieman, Alexis Abigail A Alburo, Brady Woods, Bradley W Ellis and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Thermodynamic Principles of Emerging Cryopreservation Technologies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yongdeok KimDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1068-0604
Ishan GoswamiDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Elisabeth GillDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
S Reza MahmoodiDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-9227
Anthony N ConsiglioDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94709, USA.
Jazmin VelazquezDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Gabriel NiemanDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Alexis Abigail A AlburoDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Brady WoodsDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Bradley W EllisCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Shriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Irina Filz von ReiterdankCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Shriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0234-2704
Korkut UygunCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Shriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Basak E UygunCenter for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Shriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Boris RubinskyDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Kevin E HealyDepartment of Bioengineering and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8524-3671

Funding

Development of engineered fasciocutaneous skin flapsR01AR082825 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Basak Elif Uygun · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
Development of Capillary-on-Chip for the Study of Preservation Injury on Microvascular Endothelial CellsF32HL176334 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Bradley Wayne Ellis · 2024 to 2026
$242k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL176334NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR082825NSF Engineering Research Center for Advanced Technologies for Preservation of Biological Systems (ATP-Bio) NSF EEC #1941543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelial cell damage after cold preservation and reperfusion injury causes deterioration of the endothelial barrier and ultimately results in edema, leading to transplant failure. Here, a vascular microphysiological system (MPS) is introduced as a testbed to investigate the combinational effect of thermal and fluid perturbations (i.e., wall shear stress) on human endothelial barrier function. Two methods of organ storage are compared: isochoric supercooling (ISC) preservation, which prevents ice formation at subzero temperatures; and, the standard clinical protocol of static cold storage (SCS) at 4 °C. Integrating electrical impedance measurements on chip allow real-time monitoring and quantification of barrier function during preservation and reperfusion protocols. Isochoric supercooling preservation enables longer periods of preservation with superior recovery of barrier function during reperfusion, and has lower metabolic activities compared to static cold storage. Genomic analysis reveals injury and recovery mechanisms at the molecular level for the different preservation and reperfusion conditions. The multifunctional vascular microphysiological system provides a physiologically relevant in vitro model recapitulating ischemia-reperfusion injury to the endothelium. The vascular MPS has potential for optimizing organ preservation protocols, ultimately improving organ transplant viability.

Indexed as

Organ PreservationReperfusionEndothelial CellsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsMicrophysiological SystemsReperfusion Injurybiopreservationelectrical impedance spectroscopyendothelial barrier functionisochoric supercoolingmicrophysiological system

Identifiers

PMID39972937
PMCPMC11922018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.