ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025
Adapting to an increasingly stressful environment: Experimental evidence for 'micro-evolutionary priming'.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Goal setting for thriving and sustainable success in the performing arts: taking inspiration from nature.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Genomic Insights Into Early-Stage Selective Filtering During the Transport Stage of Biological Invasions.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Asymmetric Micro-Evolutionary Responses in a Warming World: Heat-Driven Adaptation Enhances Metal Tolerance in a Planktonic Rotifer, but Not Vice Versa.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Adapting to an increasingly stressful environment: Experimental evidence for 'micro-evolutionary priming'.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Article
- Two Hypotheses About Climate Change and Species Distributions.Ecology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many natural systems, animal populations are exposed to increasing levels of stress. Stress levels tend to fluctuate, and long-term increases in average stress levels are often accompanied by greater amplitudes of such fluctuations. Micro-evolutionary adaptation may allow populations to cope with gradually increasing stress levels but may not prevent their extirpation during acute stress events unless adaptation to low stress levels also increases their tolerance to acute stress. We tested this idea, here called 'micro-evolutionary priming', by exposing populations of the monogonont rotifer species Brachionus calyciflorus to four levels of copper stress (control, low, intermediate and high) during a multigenerational selection experiment. Subsequently, in a common garden experiment, we exposed randomly selected subsets of genotypes (clones) of each of these populations to low, intermediate and high copper levels and assessed their population growth performance across multiple generations. Compared to populations with an exposure history to copper, genotypes of control populations suffered strong growth reductions when exposed to intermediate and high levels of copper, mainly as a result of high mortality rates. Remarkably, when exposed to low copper levels, fitness differences between genotypes of control populations and populations adapted to these low levels were very small, whereas the latter strongly outperformed the former at intermediate and high copper levels. These results highlight the potentially strong but hitherto largely ignored impact of micro-evolutionary priming on the performance of populations in a changing environment. We discuss the potential consequences of micro-evolutionary priming for the persistence of populations and the spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics of metapopulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.