ArticleTropical medicine and health2025
Relationship between paternal smoking behaviour and birth outcomes based on a comic booklet intervention for preventing second-hand smoke exposure to non-smoking pregnant women in Indonesia: a follow-up randomised controlled trial.
Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the harmfulness of second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure to foetuses is well-established, literature reporting foetal outcomes in experimental studies is limited. This follow-up study on preventing SHS exposure among non-smoking Indonesian pregnant women at home was based on a randomised controlled trial involving the provision of comic booklets with stickers to couples. This trial examined differences in the birth outcomes of participating couples between the experimental and control groups, factors associated with paternal smoking behaviour, and association between birth outcomes and paternal-related outcomes.
methodsIn total, 197 neonates of 286 couples who participated in an original trial were included. This study compared birth outcomes between participating couples using a comic booklet with stickers to reduce SHS exposure at home during pregnancy as the intervention. Pearson Chi-square tests were conducted to investigate significant differences in neonate sexes between the experimental and control groups. Independent sample t-tests were used to check for significant differences in birth outcome data between the experimental and control groups. A multiple regression analysis was applied to test the correlation between paternal smoking behaviour and the birth outcomes.
resultsThe gestational age in the experimental group was longer than the age in control group (mean difference = 0.373, Cohen's d = 0.291, 95% CI [0.010-0.57], p-value = 0.048). Pregnant women's avoidance of SHS strongly influenced paternal smoking behaviour in both the experimental group (b = 0.559, 95% CI [1.175-2.109], p-value < 0.001) and the control group (b = 0.429, 95% CI [0.675-1.567], p-value < 0.001). No associations were observed between birth and paternal behaviour outcomes.
conclusionsThe neonates' gestational ages were greater in the experimental group than in the control group because of our intervention effect; pregnant women's avoidance of SHS strongly influenced paternal smoking behaviour in both groups. Thus, the comic booklet intervention for smoking fathers with non-smoking pregnant partners helped reduce the risk of foetal developmental disorders. Couple-based interventions should be actively integrated into health worker strategies to effectively mitigate second-hand smoke exposure among pregnant women. Trial registration This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry under the registration number UMIN000035423 (01/02/2019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.