ArticleBMC oral health2025
Radiodiagnostic properties of maxillary antroliths: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06765148 (Radiodiagnostic Properties of Maxillary Antroliths), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Radiodiagnostic Properties of Maxillary Antroliths: a Retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A retrospective cone beam computed tomography investigation of incidental findings in the maxillo-facial region.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the frequency and radiodiagnostic characteristics of maxillary antroliths using cone beam computed tomography.
methodsA review of 1166 patients aged 11-85 years was conducted to assess the frequency of maxillary antroliths, considering sex, age, and location. The relationship between antroliths and sex, location, dental treatment status, and sinus inflammation was evaluated. The shape, size, and volume of the antroliths were also analyzed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman rank correlation, independent t-tests, and Pearson Chi-square tests.
resultsForty-eight antroliths were detected in 41 patients (3.5%), with 16 in males and 25 in females. The frequency of antroliths was higher in the 81-90- and 31-40-years age groups (p < 0.001). The most common locations were the sinus floor (56.3%) and molar region (87.5%), with an amorphous shape (47.9%). Regarding the sinus-mucosa relationship, 66.7% of patients had mucosal thickness completely covering the antroliths, and 72.9% had less than one-third of the sinus opacified. Tooth extraction was the most common dental status near the antrolith (45.8%). The shape, size, and volume of antroliths did not affect the surrounding mucosal thickness (p > 0.05), but sinuses containing antroliths had significantly thicker mucosa than those without (p = 0.036).
conclusionsThe findings indicate that although antroliths are relatively rare, predominantly located on the sinus floor and in the molar region, their presence is associated with increased mucosal thickening regardless of their shape, size, or volume. Understanding their radiographic features can aid in differential diagnosis and help anticipate potential complications during surgical interventions.
trial registrationThe trial protocol was retrospectively registered ID NCT06765148 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ); 09/01/2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.