ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Reconstruction of multiple volar finger defects with a single-pedicle five-lobed free SCIP flap: a case report of two patients.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiple Finger Reconstruction with Syndactylized Free Lateral Arm Flap.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe management of extensive volar soft tissue defects in multiple fingers remains challenging for plastic surgeons. To date, although various types of flaps have been developed as reconstruction options, the applications remain limited by the shortcomings of bloated appearance, insufficient flap area, prolonged treatment time, persistent donor complications, and the sharply increased surgical complexity with the increased number of injured fingers. The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap avoids the shortcomings of conventional flaps whilst allowing harvesting as a single-pedicle multiple-lobed form, rendering it the standout first-tier flap procedure in the repair of multiple soft tissue defects. To date, SCIP flaps with 1-4 lobes have been successfully applied, but a flap with more lobes for soft tissue defects in five fingers has not been documented. Herein, we report our experience of a single-pedicle five-lobed SCIP flap for the reconstruction of extensive soft tissue defects in digits 1-5. CASE PRESENTATION: Two male patients were admitted after a crush injury to digits 1-5 on the left hand, which necessitated flap transfer to repair the defects after debridement. The single-pedicled five-lobed SCIP flap was designed and harvested according to the perforator distribution of the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) and the shapes of the defects. After flap coverage, the artery pedicle of the flap was anastomosed to the superficial palmar arch artery or digital artery by end-to-side anastomosis, while the veins were anastomosed to the accompanied veins by end-to-end anastomosis. Post-operative examination revealed the successful survival of the SCIP flap. During follow-up, the color and texture of the flaps were close to the normal finger skin, while only linear scars remained in the donor site. The patients reported no post-operative discomfort at the donor site and were satisfied with the appearance and functionality of the reconstructed fingers.
conclusionOur study confirms that the SCIP flap can be harvested into a single-pedicle five-lobed form in clinical practice and indicates that the SCIP flap for addressing tissue defects in five fingers represents a simplified method with excellent contour, thus meeting the requirements of both functionality and aesthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.