Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972402›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2025

Determinants of Professional Commitment Among Nurses in Turkey: The Role of Workplace Incivility.

Tuğba Gözütok Konuk, Mine Yılmaz Koçak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tuğba Gözütok KonukDepartment of Fundamental of Nursing, Nursing Faculty, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4173-4663
Mine Yılmaz KoçakDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2980-9976

Funding

Selçuk Üniversitesi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo measure workplace incivility and professional commitment among nurses, explore how these factors relate to nurses' individual and professional characteristics, and identify the key factors influencing professional commitment.

designCross sectional, descriptive correlational design.

methodsThis study was conducted with 479 nurses working at a public university hospital in Turkey between May 2023 and June 2023. This study followed the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Guideline.

resultsIn this study, nurses reported experiencing a moderate level of workplace incivility (120.44 ± 32.09), with patients and visitors identified as the primary sources. Nurses also demonstrated moderate levels of professional commitment (72.00 ± 11.04). According to the multiple regression analysis, willingly choosing the profession, job satisfaction, and workplace incivility were found to significantly influence professional commitment. A key finding of the study was the negative impact of workplace incivility on professional commitment.

conclusionThe most notable finding of this study underscores the critical importance of preventing workplace incivility and increasing job satisfaction as key strategies for enhancing professional commitment. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Nurse managers should implement practices and procedures to reduce workplace incivility, promote a culture of civility in clinical nursing environments, and improve working conditions to enhance job satisfaction. It is anticipated that these measures will lead to an increase in nurses' professional commitment. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Indexed as

IncivilityJob SatisfactionNursing Staff, HospitalPersonnel LoyaltyWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyjob satisfactionnurseprofessional commitmentworkplace incivility

Identifiers

PMID39972402
PMCPMC12489425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.