Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972395›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2025

No disadvantages for women in acute stroke care in Germany: an analysis of access to stroke treatment services in Germany from 2017 to 2022.

Matthias N Ungerer, Dirk Bartig, Christine Tunkl, Daniel Richter, Aristeidis Katsanos, Christos Krogias, Werner Hacke, Christoph Gumbinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthias N UngererDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Matthias.ungerer@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8510-9237
Dirk BartigDRG Market, Osnabrück, Germany.
Christine TunklDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel RichterDepartment of Neurology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Herne, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Aristeidis KatsanosDivision of Neurology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Christos KrogiasDepartment of Neurology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Herne, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Werner HackeDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph GumbingerDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral publications have raised concerns that female stroke patients may be at a disadvantage when accessing stroke treatment services. These publications have found significant regional differences in the provision of stroke treatment to male and female patients. In this study, we provide current nationwide data on stroke management differences between men and women in Germany.

methodsThis large retrospective cohort study used national datasets from the German Federal Statistical Office for 2017-2022. We examined differences between female and male stroke patients in terms of case volume, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MTE), stroke unit (SU) treatment, intrahospital mortality, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF).

resultsData from more than 1.3 million hospitalised stroke patients were included. Forty-seven percent of the patients were female. Female patients were older and more frequently ≥ 80 years old (50.3% versus 29.4%). Rates of IVT (16.3% versus 16.3%) were similar for both sexes but higher in females when adjusted for age. MTE rates (8.2% versus 6.3%) were consistently higher in female patients across all age groups. Female patients had higher rates of intrahospital mortality (9.1% versus 6.2%), and admission to SUs (73.6% versus 76.0%) was less common. Treatment rates in intensive care units were similar (10.6% versus 10.5%). AF, a surrogate for embolic (and more severe) strokes, was more prevalent in females (32.6% versus 25.4%).

conclusionsWe found no evidence that female stroke patients in Germany face any disadvantage in accessing stroke treatment services. Acute stroke treatment rates were generally similar or higher when compared to males. Higher intrahospital mortality and lower SU rates were attributed to greater age, comorbidities, and stroke severity. However, the differences were not fully explained when adjusting for AF and age. Further research is needed on sex differences in stroke mechanisms and outcomes.

Indexed as

Ischemic strokeSex characteristics

Identifiers

PMID39972395
PMCPMC11840989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.