ReviewBMC global and public health2025
Building health research capacity in Africa: the Einstein-Rwanda research and capacity building program.
Review in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Gastrointestinal and Respiratory Pathogen Detection in Wastewater in Africa, with Focus on Rwanda: Implications for Early Warning and Public Health Surveillance.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Research capacity and decolonisation in Sub-Saharan Africa: a bibliometric analysis.BMJ global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing demand for healthcare services and the burden of diseases such as cancer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) requires locally-led and setting-relevant evidence that should be driven by local investigators. However, there is a huge gap in the health research capacity to generate such evidence in most of SSA, particularly in Rwanda. With a changing focus and the willingness of investigators and funders from high-income countries (HICs) to support investigators and research from SSA, it is important to build strong, successful, and sustained partnerships. In this perspective, we describe the Einstein-Rwanda Research and Capacity Building Program (ER-RCBP), which represents almost two decades of a fruitful and sustained partnership that has contributed to the development of research physical and human resources in Rwanda. We have established a broad range of health research infrastructure that involves human resources, including training three pathologists, leadership and administrative personnel and structures, clinical research operations, laboratory capacity, and data collection and management systems, and are implementing a long-term plan to transfer most of the leadership to local investigators and the local lead institution. Our experience demonstrates that collaborations between high- and low-income countries can be leveraged to strengthen research capacity in SSA but that such efforts require putting in place structures and systems to ensure success. Building strong partnerships and collaborations, good leadership, empowering local teams, and having buy-in from national governments are key to achieving sustainable research capacity in SSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.