ArticleGlobal health research and policy2025
Impact of the hierarchical medical system on the perceived quality of primary care in China: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in Global health research and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-assisted hierarchical primary care and health equity among older adults with chronic diseases: a matched observational mixed-methods study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Engagement of primary care physicians in medication decision-making for patients with multimorbidity in China: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Social network analysis of stakeholders in China's hierarchical medical system: toward a collaborative governance framework for enhanced integration.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Intensity of Catastrophic Health Expenditure Among Residents in a Multiethnic Province in China: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Association between China's Tiered Diagnosis and Treatment System and the utilization of basic public health services among migrants.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the implementation of a hierarchical medical system (HMS) has been shown to improve the allocation of medical resources and patient health-seeking behaviour, its role in patient's perceived quality of primary care remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the impact of HMS implementation on rural and urban residents' perceived quality of primary care.
methodsData were obtained from the China Family Panel Study for 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. A total of 40,011 rural and 22,482 urban residents were included in the research participants for analysis. This study adopted a quasi-natural experimental design, and the multiple-period difference-in-differences method was used to capture changes in patient's perceived quality of primary care before and after the introduction of HMS.
resultsWe found that HMS implementation declined the perceived quality of primary care by an average of 18% among rural residents (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99), while there was no significant change among urban residents (OR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87-1.46). There was a 24% reduction in the perceived quality of primary care (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96) one year after HMS among rural residents, and there was no statistically significant difference two years after HMS. After HMS implementation, the level of perceived quality of primary care by rural patients with chronic diseases decreased by 72% (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.78).
conclusionsHMS has a limited effect on improving residents' perceived quality of primary care, especially for those living in rural areas. Policymakers are suggested to establish a quality monitoring system that incorporates patient experience as an essential standard to systematically evaluate the impacts of the HMS, with more efforts being put into helping vulnerable groups such as residents under 60 years old and patients with chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.