Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972386›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2025

Impact of the hierarchical medical system on the perceived quality of primary care in China: a quasi-experimental study.

Yaxin Zhao, Xiaohui Zhai, Zhongliang Zhou, Zixuan Peng, Chi Shen, Xiaojing Fan, Sha Lai, Peter C Coyte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yaxin Zhao *College of Humanities & Social Development, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Xiaohui Zhai *School of Public Health, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Zhongliang ZhouSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.28 Xianning West Road, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China. zzliang1981@163.com.
Zixuan PengSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, Jiangsu, China.
Chi ShenSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.28 Xianning West Road, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.
Xiaojing FanSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.28 Xianning West Road, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.
Sha LaiSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.28 Xianning West Road, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.
Peter C CoyteDalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, 582-155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.

Funding

Major Program of National Social Science Fund of China 20&ZD121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the implementation of a hierarchical medical system (HMS) has been shown to improve the allocation of medical resources and patient health-seeking behaviour, its role in patient's perceived quality of primary care remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the impact of HMS implementation on rural and urban residents' perceived quality of primary care.

methodsData were obtained from the China Family Panel Study for 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. A total of 40,011 rural and 22,482 urban residents were included in the research participants for analysis. This study adopted a quasi-natural experimental design, and the multiple-period difference-in-differences method was used to capture changes in patient's perceived quality of primary care before and after the introduction of HMS.

resultsWe found that HMS implementation declined the perceived quality of primary care by an average of 18% among rural residents (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99), while there was no significant change among urban residents (OR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87-1.46). There was a 24% reduction in the perceived quality of primary care (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96) one year after HMS among rural residents, and there was no statistically significant difference two years after HMS. After HMS implementation, the level of perceived quality of primary care by rural patients with chronic diseases decreased by 72% (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.78).

conclusionsHMS has a limited effect on improving residents' perceived quality of primary care, especially for those living in rural areas. Policymakers are suggested to establish a quality monitoring system that incorporates patient experience as an essential standard to systematically evaluate the impacts of the HMS, with more efforts being put into helping vulnerable groups such as residents under 60 years old and patients with chronic diseases.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationUrban PopulationYoung AdultChinaDifference-in-differencesHierarchical medical systemPatients’ perceived qualityPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID39972386
PMCPMC11837713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.