Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972367›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2025

Endothelial-mesenchymal crosstalk drives osteogenic differentiation of human osteoblasts through Notch signaling.

Daria Perepletchikova, Polina Kuchur, Liubov Basovich, Irina Khvorova, Arseniy Lobov, Kseniia Azarkina, Nikolay Aksenov, Svetlana Bozhkova, Vitaliy Karelkin, Anna Malashicheva

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Myeloid-Specific Deletion ofBiomedicines · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional Divergence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daria PerepletchikovaInstitute of Cytology RAS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Polina KuchurInstitute of Cytology RAS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Liubov BasovichInstitute of Cytology RAS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Irina KhvorovaInstitute of Cytology RAS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Arseniy LobovInstitute of Cytology RAS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Kseniia AzarkinaInstitute of Cytology RAS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Nikolay AksenovInstitute of Cytology RAS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Svetlana BozhkovaVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint- Petersburg, Russia.
Vitaliy KarelkinVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint- Petersburg, Russia.
Anna MalashichevaInstitute of Cytology RAS, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. malashicheva@incras.ru.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-15-00320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiogenesis and osteogenesis are closely interrelated. The interaction between endothelial and bone-forming cells, such as osteoblasts, is crucial for normal bone development and repair. Juxtacrine and paracrine mechanisms play key roles in cell differentiation towards the osteogenic direction, assuming the direct effect of endothelium on osteogenic differentiation. However, the mechanisms of this interplay have yet to be thoroughly studied.

methodsIsolated endothelial cells (EC) from human umbilical vein and human osteoblasts (OB) from the epiphysis of the femur or tibia were cultured in direct and indirect (separated by membrane) contact in vitro under the osteogenic differentiation conditions. Osteogenic differentiation was verified by RT-PCR, and alizarin red staining. Shotgun proteomics and RNA-sequencing were used to compare both EC and OB under different co-culture conditions to assess the mechanisms of EC-OB interplay. To verify the role of Notch signaling, experiments with Notch modulation in EC were performed by EC lentiviral transduction with further co-cultivation with OB. Additionally, the effect of Notch modulation in EC was assessed by RNA-sequencing.

resultsEC have opposite effects on osteogenic differentiation depending on the co-culture conditions with OB. In direct contact, EC enhance osteogenic differentiation, but in indirect cultures, EC suppress it. Our proteotranscriptomic analysis revealed that the osteosuppressive effect is related to the action of paracrine factors secreted by EC, while the osteoinductive properties of EC are mediated by the Notch signaling pathway, which can be activated only upon a physical contact of EC with OB. Indeed, in the direct co-culture, the knockdown of Notch1 and Notch3 receptors in EC has an inhibitory effect on the OB osteogenic differentiation, whereas activation of Notch by intracellular domain of either Notch1 or Notch3 in EC has an inductive effect on the OB osteogenic differentiation.

conclusionThe data indicate the dual role of the endothelium in regulating osteogenic differentiation and highlight the unique role of the Notch signaling pathway in inducing osteogenic differentiation during cell-to-cell interactions. The findings of the study emphasize the importance of intercellular communication in the regulation of osteoblast differentiation during bone development and maintenance.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationCell DifferentiationOsteoblastsOsteogenesisReceptors, NotchSignal TransductionCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsReceptors, NotchCo-cultureEndothelial cellsNotch signalingOsteoblastsOsteogenic differentiation

Identifiers

PMID39972367
PMCPMC11841332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.