ArticleBMC research notes2025
A deep learning approach: physics-informed neural networks for solving a nonlinear telegraph equation with different boundary conditions.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nonlinear Telegraph equation appears in a variety of engineering and science problems. This paper presents a deep learning algorithm termed physics-informed neural networks to resolve a hyperbolic nonlinear telegraph equation with Dirichlet, Neumann, and Periodic boundary conditions. To include physical information about the issue, a multi-objective loss function consisting of the residual of the governing partial differential equation and initial conditions and boundary conditions is defined. Using multiple densely connected neural networks, termed feedforward deep neural networks, the proposed scheme has been trained to minimize the total loss results from the multi-objective loss function. Three computational examples are provided to demonstrate the efficacy and applications of our suggested method. Using a Python software package, we conducted several tests for various model optimizations, activation functions, neural network architectures, and hidden layers to choose the best hyper-parameters representing the problem's physics-informed neural network model with the optimal solution. Furthermore, using graphs and tables, the results of the suggested approach are contrasted with the analytical solution in literature based on various relative error analyses and statistical performance measure analyses. According to the results, the suggested computational method is effective in resolving difficult non-linear physical issues with various boundary conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.