Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972356›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

A deep learning approach: physics-informed neural networks for solving a nonlinear telegraph equation with different boundary conditions.

Alemayehu Tamirie Deresse, Alemu Senbeta Bekela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alemayehu Tamirie DeresseDepartment of Mathematics, Mizan Tepi University, South Western Ethiopia, Tepi, 260, Ethiopia. alemayehutamirie@mtu.edu.et.
Alemu Senbeta BekelaDepartment of Mathematics, Samara University, Afar, Samara, 132, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nonlinear Telegraph equation appears in a variety of engineering and science problems. This paper presents a deep learning algorithm termed physics-informed neural networks to resolve a hyperbolic nonlinear telegraph equation with Dirichlet, Neumann, and Periodic boundary conditions. To include physical information about the issue, a multi-objective loss function consisting of the residual of the governing partial differential equation and initial conditions and boundary conditions is defined. Using multiple densely connected neural networks, termed feedforward deep neural networks, the proposed scheme has been trained to minimize the total loss results from the multi-objective loss function. Three computational examples are provided to demonstrate the efficacy and applications of our suggested method. Using a Python software package, we conducted several tests for various model optimizations, activation functions, neural network architectures, and hidden layers to choose the best hyper-parameters representing the problem's physics-informed neural network model with the optimal solution. Furthermore, using graphs and tables, the results of the suggested approach are contrasted with the analytical solution in literature based on various relative error analyses and statistical performance measure analyses. According to the results, the suggested computational method is effective in resolving difficult non-linear physical issues with various boundary conditions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerNonlinear DynamicsAlgorithmsBoundary conditionsNon-linear telegraph equationPhysics-informed neural networks

Identifiers

PMID39972356
PMCPMC11837485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.