Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972355›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

A multistage double-blind placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of transdermal vitamin D phosphate supplementation (TransVitD).

Thomas Hibbard, Paolo Andriollo, Chui Hua Lim, Qing Guo, Karl P Lawrence, Bolaji Coker, Rayka Malek, Abdel Douiri, Mohamed A Alhnan, Stuart A Jones

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06098846 (Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Human Transdermal Vitamin D Supplement Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06098846 nacompletednot on this map

Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Human Transdermal Vitamin D Supplement Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2023 to 2024Enrolled108ConditionsVitamin D SupplementationArmsVitamin D phosphate, Placebo transdermal patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas Hibbard *Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Franklin-Wilkins Building, King's College London, London, UK.
Paolo Andriollo *Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Franklin-Wilkins Building, King's College London, London, UK.
Chui Hua LimInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Franklin-Wilkins Building, King's College London, London, UK.
Qing GuoInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Franklin-Wilkins Building, King's College London, London, UK.
Karl P LawrenceInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Franklin-Wilkins Building, King's College London, London, UK.
Bolaji CokerSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Rayka MalekSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Abdel DouiriSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Mohamed A Alhnan *Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Franklin-Wilkins Building, King's College London, London, UK.
Stuart A Jones *Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Franklin-Wilkins Building, King's College London, London, UK. Stuart.jones@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLifestyle changes have meant that it is problematic for many people across the globe to maintain adequate vitamin D concentrations. As UV-catalysed production in the skin, which uses vitamin D-binding protein to facilitate systemic absorption, is the primary source of vitamin D, it is questionable if oral supplementation of this vitamin is the optimal means to replace it. However, supplementing an oil-soluble vitamin via the skin is problematic as it gets stuck in the stratum corneum after topical application. This clinical study will test if a new vitamin D ester, vitamin D phosphate, which is more water-soluble compared to vitamin D, administered via a transdermal patch, can be used to improve vitamin D status.

methodThis is a two-part study comprising a dose-escalation with the vitamin D phosphate transdermal patch followed by a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiarmed, multistage clinical trial. It is a single-centred, 12-week study that will enrol a maximum of 100 participants. The dose escalation study will monitor safety and tolerability using serum calcium and 25(OH)D DISCUSSION: This study will determine if a vitamin D phosphate transdermal patch can improve vitamin D status. In addition, it could provide a better understanding of how vitamin D is absorbed directly into the skin after application by measuring the serum vitamin D-binding protein and skin biomarker responses to transdermal supplementation.

trial registrationClinical Trials.gov NCT06098846, registered on 23rd October 2023.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsPhosphatesVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitaminsAdministration, CutaneousBiomarkersCalcifediolCalciumDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTransdermal PatchBiomarkersCalcifediolCalciumPhosphatesVitamin DVitamins25(OH)D3Clinical trialInterstitial fluidTransdermalVitamin DVitamin D-binding proteinVitamin D phosphate

Identifiers

PMID39972355
PMCPMC11837352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.