ArticleBMC medical education2025
Evaluating the impact of undergraduate ophthalmology education on medical students' competency in eye care: a cross-sectional study in Jordan.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Knowledge Progression in Allied Health Sciences Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Teleophthalmology adoption and perceived barriers among Colombian general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Ophthalmology education and systemic disease integration in Syrian medical schools: a cross-sectional assessment of knowledge gaps.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOphthalmology is a crucial aspect of primary care, often featuring prominently in both general practice and emergency settings. With over 2 billion individuals worldwide affected by visual impairment, proficiency in basic ophthalmology is essential for general practitioners and emergency physicians.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving 624 medical students from six universities in Jordan. Data were collected using a questionnaire assessing knowledge, diagnostic abilities, and treatment skills in ophthalmology, alongside demographic information and student satisfaction with their ophthalmology rotations. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS to identify significant associations between variables, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
resultsThe majority of participants (44.6%) were 23 years old, and 59.8% were female. A significant proportion demonstrated proficiency in basic ophthalmic science, particularly in recognizing refractive problems and anatomical structures of the eye. Gaps were identified in understanding advanced topics such as aqueous regulation and the social-psychological impacts of visual impairment. Diagnostic abilities varied, with most students proficient in diagnosing common conditions like conjunctivitis and cataracts, but less so in identifying complex issues like intraocular foreign bodies. Treatment skills were generally lower, with significant disparities based on university affiliation and cumulative averages. Satisfaction with the ophthalmology rotation was positively correlated with better knowledge and diagnostic abilities.
conclusionThe study highlights the variable proficiency in ophthalmic knowledge and skills among medical students, influenced by factors such as university affiliation and satisfaction with ophthalmology rotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.